Driver vs Registered Keeper: Who Is Liable for a Parking Charge?
When a private parking company issues a charge, they usually send it to the registered keeper of the vehicle. They obtain your details from the DVLA and hold you responsible for the charge. But the legal basis for this is more limited than most people realise, and understanding the distinction between driver liability and keeper liability is one of the most powerful tools in your defence.
The Basic Principle
At common law, the person who is liable for breaching a contract is the person who entered into it. In parking terms, this means the driver -- the person who drove onto the land and allegedly agreed to the terms displayed on signage. The registered keeper of the vehicle may be a completely different person.
Before 2012, private parking companies had a significant problem. They could photograph a vehicle and obtain the registered keeper's details from the DVLA, but they could not prove that the keeper was the driver. Since only the driver entered the contract, the keeper had no liability.
How POFA 2012 Changed Things
The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (POFA), specifically Schedule 4, created a new concept: keeper liability. This allows parking companies to hold the registered keeper liable for a charge even if they were not the driver. But this keeper liability only arises if the parking company strictly complies with POFA's requirements.
The conditions for keeper liability are:
If any of these conditions is not met, keeper liability does not arise. The parking company can only pursue the driver, and in most cases they do not know who the driver was.
Why This Matters for Your Defence
The strategic implication is significant. If the parking company has failed to comply with POFA -- for example, by sending the Notice to Keeper late or omitting required information -- they lose the ability to hold you liable as the registered keeper.
This is why it is critical that you **do not admit to being the driver** unless you are certain it helps your case. This is one of the most common mistakes motorists make. Common mistakes include:
Once you have admitted being the driver, the POFA keeper liability argument becomes irrelevant. The company can pursue you as the driver regardless of whether they complied with POFA.
What Your Defence Should Say
In your defence, the standard approach is:
This puts the burden on the parking company. They must prove either that you were the driver or that they have complied with every POFA requirement to hold you liable as keeper.
Hired and Leased Vehicles
POFA includes specific provisions for hire vehicles. If the vehicle was hired at the time of the alleged contravention, the hire company can transfer liability to the hirer by providing certain information to the parking company within a prescribed time. If you were driving a hire car, different rules apply and you should check whether the hire company has complied with these provisions.
For company vehicles and leased cars, the registered keeper (usually the leasing company or employer) may receive the charge. They may pass it on to the named driver, but the parking company must still comply with POFA if they wish to pursue the keeper directly.
Multiple Drivers
If your vehicle is used by multiple family members or drivers, the question of who was driving becomes even more relevant. The parking company does not know who was behind the wheel. As registered keeper, you are not obliged to identify the driver. Your only obligation is to respond to the charge if you choose to do so.
Our AI defence generator automatically analyses the POFA compliance of your case based on your questionnaire answers and includes the appropriate keeper liability arguments in your defence document.
Need help with your defence?
Our AI generates a professional, court-ready defence document in minutes. No payment required to start.
Start Your DefenceRelated Articles
The 14-Day Rule: Your Secret Weapon Against Parking Charges
The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 requires parking companies to serve a notice within 14 days. Failure to comply means keeper liability does not arise.
ParkingEye v Beavis: What It Actually Means for Your Case
Parking companies cite ParkingEye v Beavis to justify their charges. But the case has clear limitations that many motorists do not know about.
How Long Do Parking Companies Have to Take You to Court?
Parking companies have 6 years to take you to court, but most act much sooner. Understanding the key time limits can strengthen your defence.